public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
@ 2008-07-09 7:47 gcc at dpinol dot com
2008-07-09 12:33 ` [Bug c++/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: gcc at dpinol dot com @ 2008-07-09 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hi,
The code at the bottom compiled with this line
gcc -fprofile-arcs -O2 -c kk.cpp
causes this crash
gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
It occurs on both:
* Suse 11.0 with gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch
revision 135036] (rpms: gcc43-4.3.1_20080507-6.1 and gcc-c++-4.3-39.1)
* gcc 4.3.1 compiled with default options on Suse 10.2
best regards
#include <vector>
class PathElement {
public:
float a;
~PathElement() {}
};
class PathPlanning {
public:
std::vector<PathElement> v;
PathPlanning();
};
PathPlanning offset2[2];
--
Summary: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc at dpinol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
@ 2008-07-09 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 12:53 ` [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-09 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 12:32 -------
*** Bug 36768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
2008-07-09 12:33 ` [Bug c++/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-09 12:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-10 14:31 ` [Bug middle-end/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-09 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 12:53 -------
This one blows the stack recursing through
#40147 0x000000000065fa9a in mangle_decl (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:2655
2655 tree id = get_identifier_nocopy (mangle_decl_string (decl));
(gdb) up
#40148 0x0000000000d23724 in decl_assembler_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree.c:304
304 lang_hooks.set_decl_assembler_name (decl);
(gdb)
#40149 0x00000000006566c7 in write_unqualified_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:1104
1104 write_source_name (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl));
(gdb) up
#40150 0x000000000065471b in write_unscoped_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:884
884 write_unqualified_name (decl);
(gdb)
#40151 0x00000000006542d0 in write_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0,
ignore_local_scope=0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:818
818 write_unscoped_name (decl);
(gdb)
#40152 0x0000000000653b0c in write_encoding (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:738
738 write_name (decl, /*ignore_local_scope=*/0);
(gdb)
#40153 0x0000000000653329 in write_mangled_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0,
top_level=1 '\001')
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:708
708 write_encoding (decl);
(gdb)
#40154 0x000000000065f6a4 in mangle_decl_string (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:2631
2631 write_mangled_name (decl, true);
(gdb)
#40155 0x000000000065fa9a in mangle_decl (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c:2655
2655 tree id = get_identifier_nocopy (mangle_decl_string (decl));
(gdb)
#40156 0x0000000000d23724 in decl_assembler_name (decl=0x7f398018d0a0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree.c:304
304 lang_hooks.set_decl_assembler_name (decl);
...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-07-09 12:53:06
date| |
Summary|Segmentation fault with - |[4.3/4.4 Regression]
|fprofile-arcs -O2 |Segmentation fault with -
| |fprofile-arcs -O2
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
2008-07-09 12:33 ` [Bug c++/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 12:53 ` [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-10 14:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-15 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-10 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |middle-end
Known to fail| |4.3.1
Known to work| |4.2.4
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-10 14:31 ` [Bug middle-end/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-15 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-21 15:32 ` [Bug c++/36767] " dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-15 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-15 15:09 -------
Shorter testcase:
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-O2 -fprofile-arcs" }
struct A { A (); ~A (); };
A a[2];
What seems to be going on is that:
#0 create_temporary_var (type=0x7ffff3252780) at ../../gcc/cp/init.c:2613
#1 0x00000000005fd921 in get_temp_regvar (type=0x7ffff3252780,
init=0x7ffff324d500) at ../../gcc/cp/init.c:2635
#2 0x00000000005fdfad in build_vec_init (base=0x7ffff324d500,
maxindex=0x7ffff325c180, init=0x0, explicit_default_init_p=0 '\0',
from_array=0, complain=tf_warning_or_error) at ../../gcc/cp/init.c:2759
#3 0x00000000005f71be in build_aggr_init (exp=0x7ffff3209e60, init=0x0,
flags=0, complain=tf_warning_or_error) at ../../gcc/cp/init.c:1279
#4 0x000000000044b5de in build_aggr_init_full_exprs (decl=0x7ffff3209e60,
init=0x0, flags=0) at ../../gcc/cp/decl.c:4978
#5 0x000000000044c648 in check_initializer (decl=0x7ffff3209e60, init=0x0,
flags=0, cleanup=0x7fffffffde00) at ../../gcc/cp/decl.c:5104
#6 0x000000000044fc53 in cp_finish_decl (decl=0x7ffff3209e60, init=0x0,
init_const_expr_p=0 '\0', asmspec_tree=0x0, flags=0) at
../../gcc/cp/decl.c:5579
creates a VAR_DECL while current_function_decl == NULL. Later on
one_static_initialization_or_destruction puts all its uses (and DECL_EXPR for
it) into the artificial __static_initialization_or_destruction, but from what I
can see nothing actually fixes up DECL_CONTEXT of the variable to the function
it has been put into. If I manually set DECL_CONTEXT of these variables
in one_static_initialization_or_destruction, it compiles just fine.
If not and the vars make it through to the expander, they have DECL_NAME () ==
NULL and that leads to infinite recursion during mangling.
I wonder where is the best place to fix the contexts up though.
Either one_static_initialization_or_destruction could walk_tree init,
look for DECL_EXPRs with artificial VAR_DECLs with NULL DECL_CONTEXT, or
say cp-gimplify.c could do that.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-15 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-21 15:32 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-21 15:44 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-21 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 15:31 -------
Okay, I could reproduce this on gcc-4_3-branch. I will work on it, if nobody is
working on it already.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-07-09 12:53:06 |2008-07-21 15:31:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-21 15:32 ` [Bug c++/36767] " dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-21 15:44 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-22 18:25 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-21 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 15:43 -------
By the way, I cannot reproduce this on trunk, changeset 138026.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-21 15:44 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-22 18:25 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 0:04 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-22 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 18:25 -------
@jakub: I confirm that doing:
if (!DECL_CONTEXT (decl))
{
DECL_CONTEXT (decl) = current_function_decl;
}
at the beginning of one_static_initialization_or_destruction() allows the
compilation to not crash.
At that point, the name of current_function_decl is effectively
"__static_initialization_and_destruction_0".
I am not sure if setting DECL_CONTEXT (decl) is safe to do, because the
DECL_CONTEXT (decl) being NULL means the variable happened in the global
namespace. Doing DECL_CONTEXT (decl) = current_function_decl makes us loose
that information.
On the other hand, one_static_initialization_or_destruction() is called at the
end of the parsing+semantic analysis phase, so loosing that information might
not be harmful (I am not sure). In which case, this candidate fix might be
enough.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-22 18:25 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-25 0:04 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 0:05 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-25 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 00:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=15957)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15957&action=view)
fixes DECL_CONTEXT() of the temporary variables in the initialiser
So this patch seems to make the crash go away for me.
I still need to add add some asserts in the mangler to prevent it from
recursing ad infinitum when a VAR_DECL has a NULL name.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-25 0:04 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-25 0:05 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 2:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-25 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 00:04 -------
By the way, I can reproduce the problem on trunk. I think I was lacking sleep
when I first said I could not reproduce it on trunk. Sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-25 0:05 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-25 2:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 7:20 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-25 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 02:32 -------
I accidentally checked in the demangler patch with my defaulted/deleted
functions work today, so you don't need to worry about that. :)
As for the patch itself, does it work to scan for DECL_EXPRs instead of the
decls themselves? I'm a bit concerned about the current patch touching decls
that it shouldn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-25 2:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-28 7:20 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 10:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 07:19 -------
Created an attachment (id=15968)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15968&action=view)
try scanning DECL_EXPR instead of VAR_DECLs directly.
@Jason: I have tried scanning DECL_EXPR and setting only VAR_DECL that are
children of DECL_EXPR. It does not work. This patch is what I have done. Maybe
I have done something bad ?
My understanding is that by walking DECL_EXPRs and getting their associated
VAR_DECL (using DECL_EXPR_DECL), all VAR_DECLs should be touched because every
single variable must be declared at least once.
So, are there cases where a VAR_DECL has never had a parent DECL_EXPR ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 7:20 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-28 10:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=15969)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15969&action=view)
update vars more specifically, adding BIND_EXPR
After talking with Jakub, it appeared that I was forgetting to update VAR_DECLS
that were attached to a BIND_EXPR.
Walking those VAR_DECLS appears to fix the problem.
Regtesting now. Will update the patch with a proper testcase when regtesting
passes.
Please feel free to comment in the meantime.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #15968|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 10:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-28 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 17:02 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 15:00 -------
There are unneeded {} pairs, when there is just one statement in for/if, you
should just write
if (something)
DECL_CONTEXT (x) = current_function_decl;
and similar for
for (.....)
if (something)
DECL_CONTEXT (var) = current_function_decl.
Also, I think it is unnecessary to pass current_function_decl as data to the
callback, current_function_decl is accessible in the callback too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-28 17:02 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:10 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 17:01 -------
Created an attachment (id=15972)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15972&action=view)
reworked patch
Reworked patch to walk BIND_EXPR_VARs only. I think there is no need to walk
VAR_DECLs via DECL_EXPR() if we walk BIND_EXPR_VARs.
The patch seems to work, regtested on trunk, x86_64.
@jakub: thanks for your comments. I did fix the patch accordingly.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #15957|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #15969|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 17:02 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-30 13:10 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-30 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:09 -------
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:07:50 2008
New Revision: 138308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138308
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <dseketel@redhat.com>
PR c++/36767
* decl2.c (fix_temporary_vars_context_r): New function.
(one_static_initialization_or_destruction): Make sure temporary
variables part of the initialiser have their DECL_CONTEXT()
properly set.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash42.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-30 13:10 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-30 13:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-30 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:19 -------
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:18:31 2008
New Revision: 138309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138309
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <dseketel@redhat.com>
PR c++/36767
* decl2.c (fix_temporary_vars_context_r): New function.
(one_static_initialization_or_destruction): Make sure temporary
variables part of the initialiser have their DECL_CONTEXT()
properly set.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/crash41.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/decl2.c
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-30 13:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-30 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-30 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:53 -------
Fixed, thanks.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-30 13:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-09 7:47 [Bug c++/36767] New: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-arcs -O2 gcc at dpinol dot com
2008-07-09 12:33 ` [Bug c++/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 12:53 ` [Bug c++/36767] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-10 14:31 ` [Bug middle-end/36767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-15 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-21 15:32 ` [Bug c++/36767] " dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-21 15:44 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-22 18:25 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 0:04 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 0:05 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-25 2:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 7:20 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 10:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 17:02 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:10 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-30 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).