From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28645 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2008 20:04:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28526 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jul 2008 20:04:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080728200416.28525.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/36403] [4.4 Regression] Some fortran tests using eoshift fail on SH In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg02105.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 20:04 ------- > and it seems as though PACK and RESHAPE would suffer from the same problem as > EOSHIFT does Seems so. I glanced through F2008 CD but I could not find more potential problems. > Is it ok if I try to write one generic conv-function for this case and call it > for all the three intrinsics? Yes, of cause. Seemingly all of them have the pattern type of the first argument = type of one of the latter arguments. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36403