public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
@ 2008-07-28 11:13 tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] " tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tcm dot home at gmx dot de @ 2008-07-28 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hello,
I am working on a larger project processing audio signals in double format. As
I needed to estimate the max. Amplitude of a buffer, it returned a faulty
value.
I debugged the assembler code and realized, that the optimizer created a faulty
computation of the maximum. By only changing one instruction, the computation
is correct.
I've reduced the code to a minimum of code supplementing function calls that
fill the buffer with a simple memcpy function.
The code is standalone. I'll include the factor.ii which is also a command line
program demonstrating the error. I've compiled it with the command line found
below. I also tried out leaving the compiler flag -march=i686 away. It just
changed my assembler code but didn't get rid of the error. Further down I'll
include my analysis of the assembler code.
g++ -o factor -Wall -v -O2 -march=i686 factor.cpp:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2
--program-suffix=-4.2 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug
--enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --disable-libmudflap --enable-targets=all
--enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu
--target=i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-3)
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/cc1plus -E -quiet -v -D_GNU_SOURCE
factor.cpp -march=i686 -Wall -O2 -fpch-preprocess -o factor.ii
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include/i486-linux-gnu"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../i486-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/i486-linux-gnu"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/include/c++/4.2
/usr/include/c++/4.2/i486-linux-gnu
/usr/include/c++/4.2/backward
/usr/local/include
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/cc1plus -fpreprocessed factor.ii -quiet
-dumpbase factor.cpp -march=i686 -auxbase factor -O2 -Wall -version -o factor.s
GNU C++ version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-3) (i486-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-3).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=45 --param ggc-min-heapsize=29241
Compiler executable checksum: f63294e1c8ecc1bf2473a5bae1642fbe
as -V -Qy -o factor.o factor.s
GNU assembler version 2.18.0 (i486-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU Binutils
for Debian) 2.18.0.20080103
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386
--hash-style=both -dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -o factor
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/crtbegin.o
-L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3
-L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib -L/lib/../lib
-L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../.. factor.o
-lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/crtend.o
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/crtn.o
The optimizer generates the error with the following line of code:
for (unsigned long i = 0; i < insize; ++i) _factor = std::max(_factor,
std::max(-data[i], data[i]));
with
double * data; (Audio Data)
unsigned long insize; (number of doubles in the buffer)
double _factor; (currently estimated, global factor)
Generated Assembler code from factor.s:
// Load data Buffer pointer to eax
movl -36(%ebp), %eax
// Clear edx (that's our i)
xorl %edx, %edx
// Load _factor on FP-Stack
fldl (%esi)
// Have _factor twice on the FP-Stack (Stack: (original)_factor,
(current)_factor)
fld %st(0)
// Start the for-loop
jmp .L45
.p2align 4,,7
.L64:
// This at the beginning of every iteration i >= 1
// This is the actual consistency error
// At this pointer we have the following on the FP-Stack: st(0):
(current)_factor, st(1): (original)_factor
// After executing this, we'll have st(0): (original)_factor, st(1):
(current)_factor, which creates a problem further down
// To show what is actually going wrong, I'll label _factor
// with original for the original factor that was present when the
// for-loop was started and current for the value, that is actually the
// correct factor.
// Note: To fix the bug, this instruction needs to be fstl %st(1) to have
// the current factors in BOTH st(0) and st(1)
fxch %st(1)
.L45:
// Load the Value from the current data Buffer Position onto the stack
// FP-Stack: st(0): data[i], st(1): (orig)_factor, st(2): (curr)_factor
fldl (%eax)
// Negate
// FP-Stack: st(0): -data[i], st(1): (orig)_factor, st(2): (curr)_factor
fchs
// Safe -data[i] to ??? - (why???)
fstl -16(%ebp)
// Load another copy of the current data Buffer value
// FP-Stack: st(0): data[i], st(1): -data[i], st(2): (orig)_factor, st(3):
(curr)_factor
fldl (%eax)
// This moves the value max(data[i],-data[i]) into st(0)
// FP-Stack: st(0): max(data[i], -data[i]), st(1): -data[i], st(2):
(orig)_factor, st(3): (curr)_factor
fucomi %st(1), %st
fcmovbe %st(1), %st
// Move the estimated max to st(1) and remove st(0)
// FP-Stack: st(0): max(data[i], -data[i]), st(1): (orig)_factor, st(2):
(curr)_factor
fstp %st(1)
// Now compare the max(data[i], -data[i]) and (curr)_factor
fucomi %st(2), %st
//Overwrite st(2) with (curr)_factor and remove st(0)
// FP-Stack: st(0): (orig)_factor, st(1): max(data[i], -data[i])
fstp %st(2)
// Exchange st(0) and st(1)
// FP-Stack: st(0): max(data[i], -data[i]), std(1): (orig)_factor
fxch %st(1)
// Now if (max(data[i], -data[i]) < (curr)_factor) then write (orig)_factor to
st(0)
// FP-Stack: st(0): (max(data[i], -data[i]) < (curr)_factor ? (orig)_factor :
max(data[i], -data[i])) , std(1): (orig)_factor
// If everything would be correct, st(0) would contain (curr)_factor now!
fcmovbe %st(1), %st
// Incriment our i
addl $1, %edx
// Incriment our data Buffer Pointer
addl $8, %eax
// Check if we need another iteration
cmpl %ebx, %edx
// If we do, jump
jne .L64
// We are finished and have a faulty (if iteration is > 1) (curr)_factor and
(orig)_factor on the stack. This overwrites the (orig) and just leaves (curr)
on the stack
fstp %st(1)
// Write the Result to memory (variable _factor)
fstpl (%esi)
--
Summary: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when
estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tcm dot home at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
@ 2008-07-28 11:16 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:50 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tcm dot home at gmx dot de @ 2008-07-28 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from tcm dot home at gmx dot de 2008-07-28 11:15 -------
Created an attachment (id=15970)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15970&action=view)
File generated with g++ -o factor -v -save-temps -Wall -O2 -march=i686
factor.cpp
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] " tcm dot home at gmx dot de
@ 2008-07-28 11:50 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tcm dot home at gmx dot de @ 2008-07-28 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tcm dot home at gmx dot de 2008-07-28 11:49 -------
*** Bug 36952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] " tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:50 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
@ 2008-07-28 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 11:35 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 13:12 -------
I can reproduce this with 4.2.4, but not with 4.1.3 or 4.3.1.
-fno-strict-aliasing fixes it, so I suspect it's a dup of one of the known
wrong-code
bugs with GCC 4.2.x
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |4.2.4
Known to work| |4.1.3 4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-29 11:35 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-08-16 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tcm dot home at gmx dot de @ 2008-07-29 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
tcm dot home at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-16 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-16 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 15:46 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-16 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 23:05 -------
Can you try 4.2.4?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-29 11:35 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
@ 2008-08-16 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-16 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 15:46 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-16 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Summary|Optimizer generates faulty |[4.2 Regression] Optimizer
|assembler code when |generates faulty assembler
|estimating max. floating |code when estimating max.
|point value in a for loop |floating point value in a
| |for loop
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-16 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 15:46 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 15:46 -------
Closing 4.2 branch, fixed for 4.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to fail|4.2.4 |4.2.4 4.2.5
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36953
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-31 15:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-28 11:13 [Bug tree-optimization/36953] New: Optimizer generates faulty assembler code when estimating max. floating point value in a for loop tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] " tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 11:50 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-07-28 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 11:35 ` tcm dot home at gmx dot de
2008-08-16 23:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36953] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-16 23:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 15:46 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).