public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
@ 2008-07-26 18:17 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36945] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-26 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
struct Bar { int a; int b; };
struct Foo { int x; struct Bar y; };
int __attribute__((const)) foo (struct Bar);
int bar (int b)
{
struct Foo f;
int c;
while (b--)
{
c = foo(f.y);
}
return c;
}
./cc1 -quiet -O2 t.i -fdump-tree-all-details
t.i: In function 'bar':
t.i:7: internal compiler error: vector VEC(vn_reference_op_s,base) index domain
error, in create_component_ref_by_pieces at tree-ssa-pre.c:2413
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate
function arguments correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-26 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 19:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-26 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 18:17 -------
I'll deal with it.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-07-26 18:17:11
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36945] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-26 19:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-26 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 19:33 -------
The simplest solution is to punt value-numbering calls with arguments that
do not fit in one vn_reference_op.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36945] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 19:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-29 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-29 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 13:57 -------
I have a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-29 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 17:10 -------
Subject: Bug 36945
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:09:26 2008
New Revision: 138257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138257
Log:
2008-07-29 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/36945
* tree-ssa-sccvn.h (copy_reference_ops_from_ref): Declare.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (copy_reference_ops_from_ref): Export.
Record invariant addresses un-decomposed.
(copy_reference_ops_from_call): Record reference call
arguments properly. Simplify.
* tree-ssa-pre.c (create_component_ref_by_pieces_1): New
helper split out from ...
(create_component_ref_by_pieces): ... here. Simplify.
Prepare for recursive invocation for call arguments.
(create_expression_by_pieces): Adjust call to
create_component_ref_by_pieces.
(compute_avail): Process operand 2 of reference ops.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-18.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-18.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36945] [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-29 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-29 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 17:09 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36945
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-29 17:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-26 18:17 [Bug tree-optimization/36945] New: [4.4 Regression] PRE/SCCVN do not handle aggregate function arguments correctly rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36945] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-26 19:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-29 17:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).