From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7124 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2008 14:45:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 5972 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jul 2008 14:44:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080731144422.5971.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg02337.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 14:44 ------- Richard, there is one problem that is "yours". We conclude that call is uninlinable due to type missmatch. This should not happen on C++. This gets misdiagnozed as originally recursive inlning was only reason why inlining of always_inline could've failed on one specific call but not other. Now we have mismatches and the function specific stuff. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36631