From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5515 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 13:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 3929 invoked by uid 48); 1 Aug 2008 13:21:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080801132135.3928.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/36992] Very stange code for _mm_move_epi64 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 13:21 ------- with -march=core2 it uses movd %xmm0, %rax movq %rax, %xmm0 with -march=opteron (and -march=generic) it uses movhps .LC0(%rip), %xmm0 ISTR there is some penalty for using movq on opteron? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36992