From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32272 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2008 23:41:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 30626 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2008 23:40:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080808234025.30625.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-08 23:40 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 23:34 ------- > Mark, the tests started failing because -fdump-rtl-loop2 used to produce dump > files for all loop2_* passes. The compiler could be fixed to do that again, or > the tests mentioned here could be changed to use -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll and > -fdump-rtl-loop2_invariant instead of -fdump-rtl-loop2. I was expecting > someone to fix the compiler after Andrew complained about the change, but I > wouldn't mind modifying the tests and closing this PR. OK, I understand much better now, thanks! Do we have a separate PR open for the problem as well, or shall I retitle this one to more accurately reflect the problem? Thanks, -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087