From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15540 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2008 13:30:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 14570 invoked by uid 48); 21 Aug 2008 13:28:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080821132838.14569.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg01523.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-21 13:28 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Same thing here on i686-apple-darwin9. But was the failures you see too introduced with r139233? I can't tell myself because I see no test-results for i686-apple-darwin on gcc-testresults@ (hint hint). > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?foo > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c If not, given the failures, I'd guess you're looking at a different bug. (Please open a separate PR, this one will cover just the weak-related bug matching the original description.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170