From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21782 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2008 19:05:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21204 invoked by uid 48); 21 Aug 2008 19:04:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080821190434.21203.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "eric dot weddington at atmel dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg01552.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 19:04 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?foo > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1i > FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1j > Ok, patched correctly, and verified that the patch does NOT fix the above regressions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170