From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24195 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2008 15:27:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 17044 invoked by uid 48); 22 Aug 2008 15:25:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080822152555.17043.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg01675.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #25 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 15:25 ------- Created an attachment (id=16130) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16130&action=view) Patch, take 3. Thanks for your reports! I stupidly forgot to move out the tree type checks from inside the #ifdef and just couldn't see it! Odd that the weak-test-cases didn't trig this. Now fixed. Lightly checked that it still fixes the C regressions covered by weak.exp for avr and darwin-i686, new regression runs started for cris-elf and native. Please, test on your targets! -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #16125|0 |1 is obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170