From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31537 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2008 17:22:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 30869 invoked by uid 48); 25 Aug 2008 17:20:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080825172057.30867.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "eric dot weddington at atmel dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg01928.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #44 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 17:20 ------- (In reply to comment #43) > > Patch #4 still fixes all "weak" test regressions on avr. > > Did you test g++? > Yes. I build and test for c, c++, ada, and objc (yes, it actually builds for AVR). I have 2 less fails now on c++ than I did on 2008-08-21 (revision 139385), but that could be due to almost anything. I don't pay attention much to c++ test results for avr, mainly because there are 1064 failures and I don't have very many users of c++ on avr. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170