public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/37281] bad code generation with enum and -m32
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829163947.930.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-37281-9476@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 16:39 -------
Subject: Re: New: bad code generation with enum and -m32
This code is undefined as the value of 32 is outside the range of the
enum.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2008, at 9:29, "gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> This is a copy of a Debian report that I made (I thought I might as
> well report
> it directly here too): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496965
>
> g++ generates bad code for this program on an amd64 machine. It
> works with
> fine in 64-bit and with older versions of gcc.
>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> struct MyTypes {
> enum Type {
> NOVALUE = 1,
> VALUE = 30,
> VALUE2 = 31,
> VALUE3 = -3
> };
>
> static bool isValue(MyTypes::Type value);
> };
>
> bool MyTypes::isValue(MyTypes::Type value)
> {
> switch (value) {
> case MyTypes::VALUE:
> case MyTypes::VALUE2:
> case MyTypes::VALUE3: {
> return true;
> }
> default: {
> return false;
> }
> }
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> if (true == MyTypes::isValue(MyTypes::Type(32))) {
> abort();
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> guillaum@canard:~$ g++ -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp
> guillaum@canard:~$ ./e
> Aborted
> guillaum@canard:~$ g++ -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp
> guillaum@canard:~$ ./e
> guillaum@canard:~$ g++-4.2 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp
> guillaum@canard:~$ ./e
> guillaum@canard:~$ g++-4.1 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp
> guillaum@canard:~$ ./e
>
> It works with -O2 though (not -O1):
> guillaum@canard:~$ g++ -O2 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp
> guillaum@canard:~$ ./e
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: lenny/sid
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
>
> --
> Summary: bad code generation with enum and -m32
> Product: gcc
> Version: 4.3.1
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: c++
> AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> ReportedBy: gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37281
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37281
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 16:30 [Bug c++/37281] New: " gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net
2008-08-29 16:39 ` Andrew Thomas Pinski
2008-08-29 16:41 ` pinskia at gmail dot com [this message]
2008-08-29 16:59 ` [Bug c++/37281] " gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net
2008-08-29 17:02 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-04 4:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080829163947.930.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).