From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9556 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2008 18:25:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 8049 invoked by uid 48); 29 Aug 2008 18:24:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080829182435.8048.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg02381.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 18:24 ------- I suspect this patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01903.html is incorrect. Back it out from IRA branch fixed the testcase in comment #11. I am running SPEC CPU 2000/2006 with IRA branch using revision 139581 and revision 139582 on Linux/ia32 and Linux/Intel64. It will tell us if revision 139582 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37243