From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7909 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2008 14:07:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 2329 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2008 14:06:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080902140628.2328.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #80 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-02 14:06 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c > Any news on the hppa testing? I didn't do anything further with the 32-bit port. I did do a hppa64-hpux11.11 build with your change. I went through the C test results yesterday. Although there are lots of failures, I didn't see any problem related to your proposed change. So, if there are no other problems, I would say submit the change for review. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170