From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-260397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5324 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2008 16:46:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 4386 invoked by uid 48); 2 Sep 2008 16:44:54 -0000
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20080902164454.4385.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-36908-14002@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/36908] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap forever with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -ftree-loop-distribution"
In-Reply-To: <bug-36908-14002@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2



------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-02 16:44 -------
Why got this even marked as regression?  GCC 4.3.1 didn't support
-ftree-loop-distribution, it is a new option, so it can't regress.
The loop in question is:
<bb 8>:
  # state_89 = PHI <state_17(9), state_5(7)>
  # prephitmp.18_6 = PHI <state_89(9), pretmp.17_59(7)>
  state_17 = state_89->next_alt_state;
  state_89->next_alt_state = prephitmp.18_6;
  first_free_alt_state_lsm.29_18 = state_89;
  if (state_17 != 0B)
    goto <bb 9>;
  else
    goto <bb 10>;

<bb 9>:
  goto <bb 8>;
and gets distributed into:
<bb 16>:
  # state_62 = PHI <state_22(17), state_5(7)>
  # prephitmp.18_26 = PHI <state_62(17), pretmp.17_59(7)>
  state_22 = state_62->next_alt_state;
  state_62->next_alt_state = prephitmp.18_26;
  if (state_22 != 0B)
    goto <bb 17>;
  else
    goto <bb 18>;

<bb 17>:
  goto <bb 16>;

<bb 18>:
  # prephitmp.18_90 = PHI <prephitmp.18_26(16)>

<bb 8>:
  # state_89 = PHI <state_17(9), state_5(18)>
  state_17 = state_89->next_alt_state;
  state_89->next_alt_state = prephitmp.18_90;
  first_free_alt_state_lsm.29_18 = state_89;
  if (state_17 != 0B)
    goto <bb 9>;
  else
    goto <bb 10>;

<bb 9>:
  goto <bb 8>;
Perhaps tree-loop-distribution.c is confused by a PHI depending on previous PHI
result?


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36908