public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
@ 2008-07-09 0:58 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (25 more replies)
0 siblings, 26 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-09 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
libtool: compile: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/
./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/x86_64-suse-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/home/dave/gn
u/gcc/objdir/x86_64-suse-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/x86_64-
suse-linux/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/x86_64-suse-linux/lib/
-isystem /home/dave/opt/g
nu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/x86_64-suse-linux/include -isystem
/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/x86_64-suse-li
nux/sys-include -m32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../gcc/libjava -I./include
-I./gcj -I../../../../gcc/libjava -Iinclude -I../../../../gcc/libjava/include
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/include -Iclasspath/include
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/../boehm-gc/include -I../boehm-gc/include
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/libltdl -I../../../../gcc/libjava/libltdl
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/.././libjava/../gcc -I../../../../gcc/libjava/../zlib
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/../libffi/include -I../libffi/include
-I../libstdc++-v3/include -I../libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-suse-linux
-I../../../../gcc/libjava/../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -fno-rtti
-fnon-call-exceptions -fdollars-in-identifiers -Wswitch-enum
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -ffloat-store -fomit-frame-pointer -Wextra -Wall
-D_GNU_SOURCE -DPREFIX=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0\"
-DTOOLEXECLIBDIR=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.4.0/32\"
-DJAVA_HOME=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0\"
-DBOOT_CLASS_PATH=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/share/java/libgcj-4.4.0.jar\"
-DJAVA_EXT_DIRS=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/share/java/ext\"
-DGCJ_ENDORSED_DIRS=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/share/java/gcj-endorsed\"
-DGCJ_VERSIONED_LIBDIR=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/lib/../lib/gcj-4.4.0-10\"
-DPATH_SEPARATOR=\":\" -DECJ_JAR_FILE=\"\"
-DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE=\"/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/lib/../lib/gcj-4.4.0-10/classmap.db\"
-DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE_PATH_TAIL=\"gcj-4.4.0-10/classmap.db\" -g -O2
-D_GNU_SOURCE -m32 -MT gnu/gcj/xlib/lib_gnu_awt_xlib_la-natGC.lo -MD -MP -MF
gnu/gcj/xlib/.deps/lib_gnu_awt_xlib_la-natGC.Tpo -c
../../../../gcc/libjava/gnu/gcj/xlib/natGC.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o
gnu/gcj/xlib/.libs/lib_gnu_awt_xlib_la-natGC.o
../../../../gcc/libjava/gnu/gcj/xlib/natGC.cc: In member function 'void
gnu::gcj::xlib::GC::updateClip(AWTRectArray*)':
../../../../gcc/libjava/gnu/gcj/xlib/natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
dave@linux-qx3f:~/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc> ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-shared
--prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0
--with-local-prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --build=x86_64-suse-linux --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-java-awt=xlib--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=generic
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20080708 (experimental) [trunk revision 137646] (GCC)
Running under gdb:
...
*, jint, jint, jint) void gnu::gcj::xlib::GC::updateClip(AWTRectArray*)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
last_stmt (bb=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h:789
789 if (bb->index < NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS)
(gdb) bt
#0 last_stmt (bb=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h:789
#1 0x000000000082d45e in tree_purge_dead_eh_edges (bb=0x0) at
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:6888
#2 0x000000000082d606 in tree_purge_all_dead_eh_edges (blocks=<value optimized
out>)
at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:6916
#3 0x00000000009421ce in fini_pre () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4144
#4 0x000000000094a765 in execute_pre (do_fre=1 '\001') at
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4227
#5 0x00000000007a0453 in execute_one_pass (pass=0x11257a0) at
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1293
#6 0x00000000007a0685 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x11257a0) at
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1343
#7 0x00000000007a069d in execute_pass_list (pass=0x1123e40) at
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1344
#8 0x000000000088f636 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x7fc7f1cd18f0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:425
#9 0x0000000000a40372 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x7fc7f1cedc00)
at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1158
#10 0x0000000000a42de4 in cgraph_optimize () at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1221
#11 0x00000000004b6125 in cp_write_global_declarations () at
../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:3538
#12 0x00000000008255cf in toplev_main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value
optimized out>)
at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:976
#13 0x00007fc7f292d436 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#14 0x0000000000404529 in _start ()
--
Summary: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-09 1:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-09 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |build, ice-on-valid-code
Summary|natGC.cc:229: internal |[4.4 Regression]
|compiler error: Segmentation|natGC.cc:229: internal
|fault |compiler error: Segmentation
| |fault
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-09 1:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-10 23:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2008-07-09 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 01:56 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
need .ii file at least.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
> | |org
> Keywords| |build, ice-on-valid-code
> Summary|natGC.cc:229: internal |[4.4 Regression]
> |compiler error: Segmentation|natGC.cc:229: internal
> |fault |compiler error: Segmentation
> | |fault
> Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2008-07-10 23:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-11 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-10 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 23:02 -------
Also occurs on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-10 23:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-11 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-11 18:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-11 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:29 -------
Created an attachment (id=15900)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15900&action=view)
natGC.ii
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-11 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-11 18:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-18 17:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-11 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-11 18:31 -------
The previously attached natGC.ii is from powerpc-apple-darwin9.3.0.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andreast at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-07-11 18:31:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-11 18:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-18 17:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 2:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (19 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-18 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-18 17:00 -------
Is this fixed now?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-18 17:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 2:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2008-07-20 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-07-20 02:42 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> Is this fixed now?
No. Still broken with revision 137996.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 2:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2008-07-20 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 11:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|2008-07-11 18:31:55 |2008-07-20 11:15:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 11:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 14:04 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 11:16 -------
x86_64-linux-gnu (obviously) works for me.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |
GCC host triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |
GCC target triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |ppc-apple-darwin, hppa-
| |linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 11:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 14:04 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-20 14:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2008-07-20 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 14:03 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
I tried i686-darwin and it work for me too.
I'll try cross to ppc-darwin.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 11:16 -------
> x86_64-linux-gnu (obviously) works for me.
>
>
> --
>
> rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> GCC build triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |
> GCC host triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |
> GCC target triplet|x86_64-suse-linux |ppc-apple-darwin, hppa-
> | |linux-gnu
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 14:04 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2008-07-20 14:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 15:37 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (14 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 14:56 -------
aehm, triggers on ppc-linux as well. Important key: --enable-java-awt=xlib
Otherwise it does not trigger on a default config for libjava.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 14:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 15:37 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 16:10 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2008-07-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-07-20 15:36 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
> ------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 11:16 -------
> x86_64-linux-gnu (obviously) works for me.
Have you tried configuring with --enable-java-awt="xlib"? Otherwise,
it works for me with suse 11.0.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 15:37 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2008-07-20 16:10 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 16:10 -------
--enable-java-awt=xlib makes it break under i686-darwin and i686-linux as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 16:10 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 17:07 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (11 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 16:38 -------
Can you then provide preprocessed source that breaks? ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 17:07 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 17:47 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2008-07-20 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-07-20 17:06 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Attached x86_64 version. This is the third time of tried to send this.
Dave
------- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-07-20 17:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=15932)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15932&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 17:47 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 17:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 17:46 -------
With the first preprocessed source I can reproduce this with -O2
-fnon-call-exceptions on powerpc-linux-gnu, reducing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet|ppc-apple-darwin, hppa- |
|linux-gnu |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 17:07 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2008-07-20 17:47 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 17:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 17:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=15933)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15933&action=view)
preprocessed source from i686-linux
The preprocessed source from i686-linux....
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 17:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 21:14 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-20 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 19:15 -------
Reduced testcase compile with -O1 -fnon-call-exceptions:
struct _Vector_base {
~_Vector_base() {
int* _M_start1 = this->_M_start;
}
int* _M_start;
};
struct vector : _Vector_base
{
vector(){
int* _M_start1 = this->_M_start;
}
~vector(){
int* _M_start1 = this->_M_start;
}
};
void updateClip() {
vector* xrectvector = new vector;
delete xrectvector;
}
--- CUT ---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-20 21:14 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-25 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2008-07-20 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 21:13 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
All the blocks we have marked in the bitmap to eh cleanup exist when
we pass them to tree_purge_dead_eh_edges.
tree_purge_dead_eh_edges seems to decide to delete some of them
earlier than it expects, and then crashes when they don't later exist.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:39 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
> | |org
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-20 21:14 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2008-07-25 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 16:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-25 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 18:30 -------
Fyi, this seems resloved on the tuples branch. Tested on various darwin
combinations and on i686-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-25 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-28 16:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-08 20:51 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-28 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 16:15 -------
I can reproduce this on the trunk after the tuples merge (i686).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2008-07-20 11:15:21 |2008-07-28 16:15:43
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-28 16:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-08 20:51 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-08 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 20:50 -------
Ok, to clarify, the bootstrap issue 'has gone', but the reduced test case from
#17 still fails. Failure confirmed on i686-apple-darwin r138861.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-08 20:51 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-02 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-02 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 14:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=16191)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16191&action=view)
gcc44-pr36766.patch
I don't see tree-ssa-dom.c or tree-ssa-pre.c are at fault here (not guessing
that some basic block will be purged as unneeded), so it should be
gimple_purge_all_eh_edges that needs to be changed to handle this.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-02 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-02 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:54 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-02 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:15 -------
Subject: Bug 36766
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 2 19:13:47 2008
New Revision: 139908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139908
Log:
PR tree-optimization/36766
* tree-cfg.c (gimple_purge_all_dead_eh_edges): Do nothing
for already removed basic blocks.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr36766.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr36766.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-cfg.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-02 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-02 19:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:54 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-02 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:33 -------
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-02 19:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-02 19:54 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2008-09-02 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-02 19:53 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
> Fixed.
Thanks,
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-02 19:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-09 0:58 [Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-09 1:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-10 23:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-11 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-11 18:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-18 17:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 2:42 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 11:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 14:04 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-20 14:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 15:37 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 16:10 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 17:07 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-07-20 17:47 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 17:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-20 21:14 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-07-25 18:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-28 16:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-08 20:51 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-02 19:54 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).