public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
@ 2008-09-08 9:10 janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 9:28 ` [Bug fortran/37420] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-08 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Consider the following Fortran code:
subroutine s(x)
real :: x
integer :: i
end subroutine
Compiling this with "gfortran-4.3 -Wunused-variable" triggered two warnings:
Warning: Unused variable 'i' declared at (1)
Warning: Unused dummy argument 'x' at (1)
With recent trunk builds the first one is missing, and only the missing dummy
argument is detected. This seems to be a Fortran-specific problem, since unused
variables in C code are reported as expected.
Observed on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with rev. 140091.
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-08 9:28 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 18:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-08 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 09:26 -------
There used to be a message in fortran-format, not a middle end message.
See PR24784.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 9:28 ` [Bug fortran/37420] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-08 18:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 20:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-08 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 18:22 -------
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-09-08 18:22:54
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 9:28 ` [Bug fortran/37420] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 18:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-08 20:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 10:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-08 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 20:16 -------
I saw it around 2008-02-28-r132751 / 2008-02-29-r132761, however, as the SVN
looks innocent, one should not rely one the exact date. Before that date, with
"-O -Wunused-variable" one could get a message, afterwards it stopped.
Maybe one should do a proper regression search.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-08 20:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-09 10:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 12:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-09 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-09 10:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-09 12:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 13:24 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-09 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 12:15 -------
That algorithm looks bogus:
generate_local_decl (gfc_symbol * sym)
{
if (sym->attr.flavor == FL_VARIABLE)
{
/* Check for dependencies in the array specification and string
length, adding the necessary declarations to the function. We
mark the symbol now, as well as in traverse_ns, to prevent
getting stuck in a circular dependency. */
sym->mark = 1;
[...]
else if (warn_unused_variable
&& !(sym->attr.in_common || sym->attr.use_assoc || sym->mark))
It might be that sym->mark is somewhere reset, but I don't see where; if it is
not reset then it is clear that the message is not printed.
I think it got broken by Rev. 132756:
else if (warn_unused_variable
- && !(sym->attr.in_common || sym->attr.use_assoc))
+ && !(sym->attr.in_common || sym->attr.use_assoc || sym->mark))
+2008-02-28 Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
+
+ PR fortran/31463
+ PR fortran/33950
+ PR fortran/34296
See also:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=132756
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-09 12:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-09 13:24 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 17:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-09 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 13:23 -------
> I think it got broken by Rev. 132756
Confirmed :(
Further down in trans-decl.c (introduced in the same revision):
3547: /* Prevents "Unused variable" warning for RESULT variables. */
3548: sym->mark = sym->result->mark = 1;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-09 13:24 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-09 17:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-10 11:55 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-10 11:56 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-09 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 17:24 -------
Mine
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-09-08 18:22:54 |2008-09-09 17:24:35
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-09 17:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-10 11:55 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-10 11:56 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-10 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 11:54 -------
FIXED on the trunk (4.4.0)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/37420] [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-10 11:55 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-10 11:56 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-10 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 11:55 -------
Subject: Bug 37420
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 10 11:54:08 2008
New Revision: 140229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140229
Log:
2008-09-10 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/37420
* trans-decl.c (get_proc_pointer_decl): Fix -Wunused-variable.
2008-09-10 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/37420
* gfortran.dg/warn_unused_var.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/warn_unused_var.f90: Add cleanup-modules.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/warn_unused_var.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_12.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37420
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-10 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-08 9:10 [Bug fortran/37420] New: [4.4 Regression] -Wunused-variable broken janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 9:28 ` [Bug fortran/37420] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 18:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-08 20:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 10:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 12:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 13:24 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-09 17:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-10 11:55 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-10 11:56 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).