From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27808 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2008 06:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26453 invoked by uid 48); 10 Sep 2008 06:48:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080910064808.26452.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/37445] Host-associated proc not found if same-name generic is use-associated In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg01192.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-09-10 06:48 ------- (In reply to comment #6): actually, I rather sure that gfortran gets it wrong. This would be a wrong-code MODULE M1 CONTAINS SUBROUTINE S1 write(6,*) "M1 OK" CALL ABORT() END SUBROUTINE END MODULE MODULE M2 USE M1 CONTAINS SUBROUTINE S2 CALL S1() CONTAINS SUBROUTINE S1 write(6,*) "M2 OK" END SUBROUTINE END SUBROUTINE END MODULE USE M2 CALL S2 END -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |32834 nThis| | Keywords| |rejects-valid, wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37445