public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/37462]  New: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression
@ 2008-09-10 14:37 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 15:01 ` [Bug target/37462] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-09-10 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc performance regression
in SPEC CPU 2000 on Intel Core 2 running Linux/x86-64 with
-O2 -ffast-math.


-- 
           Summary: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc
                    regression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37462] [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression
  2008-09-10 14:37 [Bug target/37462] New: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-09-10 15:01 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 16:49 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 16:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-09-10 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2008-09-10 14:59 -------
Honza suggested that

---
This mostl likely mean that your glibc has slow memset implementation.
I saw similar drop on SPEC2000 GCC and Debian machines used by
compilation farm.  I was told that FSF glibc was finally updated with
new GCC so hopefully this problem is solved now.

Our (Opteron based) SPEC2006 tester seems fine
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-balakirew-head-64-2006/403_gcc_big.png
---

I will verify it on Fedora 9.


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Joey dot ye at intel dot
                   |                            |com, weiliang dot lin at
                   |                            |intel dot com, xuepeng dot
                   |                            |guo at intel dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37462] [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression
  2008-09-10 14:37 [Bug target/37462] New: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 15:01 ` [Bug target/37462] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-09-10 16:49 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 16:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-09-10 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2008-09-10 16:48 -------
I verified that on Fedora 9 there is no regression between
revision 140029 and 140030 on Intel Core 2.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37462] [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression
  2008-09-10 14:37 [Bug target/37462] New: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 15:01 ` [Bug target/37462] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-09-10 16:49 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-09-10 16:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-09-10 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2008-09-10 16:48 -------
Works on Fedora 9.


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37462


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-10 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-10 14:37 [Bug target/37462] New: [4..4 Regression] Revision 140030 caused >10% 176.gcc regression hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-09-10 15:01 ` [Bug target/37462] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-09-10 16:49 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-09-10 16:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).