From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29680 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2008 14:29:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 28170 invoked by uid 48); 11 Sep 2008 14:27:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080911142749.28169.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/37472] bad output on default-format write of double in common block with -m64 flag i In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-09/txt/msg01364.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-11 14:27 ------- Jerry, do you know why gfortran 4.3/4.4 prints one trailing zero more for 1000 than for other numbers? 4.2 used the same number of trailing digits. 1000.00000 1001.0000 for print *, 1000.0 print *, 1001.0 end If one uses 0.2 more, one gets the expected 1000.2000 1001.2000 And for 100.0 it is off by one again. (Maybe you have also an idea about the problem in comment 0.) -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37472