public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/37443]  New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit
@ 2008-09-09 13:59 ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-13 12:28 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com @ 2008-09-09 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

consider the code fragment:

uint64_t slow(uint64_t x) {
  return x / 1220703125u;
}

This can be replaced by:

uint64_t fast(uint64_t x) {
  uint32_t a = ((x >> 32) * 1270091284u) >> 32;
  uint32_t b = ((x & 0xffffffffu) * 3777893186u) >> 32;
  return ((x >> 32) * 3777893186ull + a + b) >> 30;
}

The 'fast' code runs 50% faster than 'slow'. However, removing the redundant
multiplies (see my earlier bug - fixed in 4.4 trunk) and tidying up storage, I
can use the following assembler to run nearly 100% faster than 'slow':

        .p2align 4,,15
.globl _fast
        .def    _fast;  .scl    2;      .type   32;     .endef
_fast:
        pushl   %ebx
        movl    $1270091284, %eax
        mull    12(%esp)
        movl    $-517074110, %eax
        movl    %edx, %ebx
        mull    8(%esp)
        movl    $-517074110, %eax
        movl    %edx, %ecx
        mull    12(%esp)
        addl    %ebx, %ecx
        popl    %ebx
        adcl    $0, %edx
        addl    %ecx, %eax
        adcl    $0, %edx
        shrdl   $30, %edx, %eax
        shrl    $30, %edx
        ret

NOTE: the 2 multipliers are derived using 96-bit arithmetic:

d = 1220703125u

-517074110 = 0xffe12e1342u = (((1u << 94) + d - 1) / d) >> 32

1270091284 = (((1u << 94) + d - 1) / d) & 0xffffffffu


-- 
           Summary: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit
  2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
@ 2008-09-13 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-16  0:18 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-13 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-09-13 12:26:41
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit
  2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-13 12:28 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-16  0:18 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-16  7:16 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com @ 2008-09-16  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com  2008-09-16 00:17 -------
I have tested my initial routine with more values and it turns out that the
short-cut of omitting the least significant multiplication is wrong. I added
the 4th multiply to generate the full 128-bit precision. I also took the
multiplier used by gcc 4.2.3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (ubuntu) (4056481920730334085)
and (28+64) bit shift to achieve the division by 1220703125u (largest 32-bit
power of 5):

uint64_t fast(uint64_t x) {
  static const uint64_t fact = 4056481920730334085ull;
  uint32_t c = ((x & 0xffffffffu) * (fact & 0xffffffffu)) >> 32;
  uint64_t a = ((x & 0xffffffffu) * (fact >> 32) + c);
  /*
   * Split the addition of the two middle 64-bit intermediate results
   * into 2 stages to avoid possible overflow.
   * (not actually an issue with this value of 'fact')
   */
  uint32_t b = ((x >> 32) * (fact & 0xffffffffu) + (a & 0xffffffffu)) >> 32;
  return ((x >> 32) * (fact >> 32) + (a >> 32) + b) >> 28;
}

After hand coding the assembler on 32-bit x86, the extra multiply increased the
run time from 15s to 17s - still much faster than 'slow' (64-bit divide API
call).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform
  2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-13 12:28 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-16  0:18 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
@ 2008-09-16  7:16 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-20 17:34 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-21  2:41 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com @ 2008-09-16  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com  2008-09-16 07:15 -------
I changed the summary as it is equally applicable to all 64-bit constant
divides on 32-bit x86 that are already compiled as multiplies on 64-bit x64. It
might be worth implementing as another API call, replacing the 64-bit divisor
with a 64-bit multiplier and a shift count.


-- 

ajrobb at bigfoot dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|fast 64-bit divide by       |fast 64-bit divide by
                   |constant 32-bit             |constant on 32-bit platform


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform
  2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-16  7:16 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
@ 2008-09-20 17:34 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  2008-09-21  2:41 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com @ 2008-09-20 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com  2008-09-20 17:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=16369)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16369&action=view)
proposed 32-bit API calls for 64-bit constant divison

I have attached a sample assembler code for a API calls for the 2 types of
64-bit division through multiplication:

mul0shift - for multiplier with 64 or fewer significant bits

mul1shift - for multiplier with 65 significant bits (implicit high bit)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform
  2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-20 17:34 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
@ 2008-09-21  2:41 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ajrobb at bigfoot dot com @ 2008-09-21  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from ajrobb at bigfoot dot com  2008-09-21 02:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=16370)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16370&action=view)
proposed 32-bit API calls for 64-bit constant divison

The original attachment did not handle shift greater than 31.


-- 

ajrobb at bigfoot dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #16369|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37443


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-21  2:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-09 13:59 [Bug c/37443] New: fast 64-bit divide by constant 32-bit ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
2008-09-13 12:28 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-16  0:18 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
2008-09-16  7:16 ` [Bug middle-end/37443] fast 64-bit divide by constant on 32-bit platform ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
2008-09-20 17:34 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com
2008-09-21  2:41 ` ajrobb at bigfoot dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).