* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-13 20:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-13 20:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-13 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-13 20:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=15474)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15474&action=view)
Backtrace
Confirmed. Backtrace is attached.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-13 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/35846] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-13 20:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-20 7:33 ` d at domob dot eu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-13 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-13 20:33:00
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-13 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/35846] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-13 20:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-20 7:33 ` d at domob dot eu
2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: d at domob dot eu @ 2008-05-20 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-20 07:33 -------
Created an attachment (id=15655)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15655&action=view)
Hackish patch
It seems the problem lies in gfc_conv_string_length, that can be called with a
gfc_charlen whose length is NULL. This patch is somewhat a prove of concept
of this, just creating a dummy length if it is NULL there; this prevents the
ICEs described above.
Of course this is surely not the correct place to do this initialization, I'll
try to find it out later and work out a real patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-20 7:33 ` d at domob dot eu
@ 2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: d at domob dot eu @ 2008-05-21 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-21 15:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=15663)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15663&action=view)
Testcase without nested array constructors
Actually, this does not depend on nested array constructors as this test-case
proves (and also has nothing to do with the globals used for bounds-checking,
it seems).
I believe the problem is that the gfc_expr* corresponding to the concatenation
doesn't have a cl->length set on its ts (because the arguments don't have one
when resolution is called); this NULL later causes the ICE. When this
expression turns up in an assignment, this does not matter as the expected
length is known from the target's character length definition.
But when there is no "expected" charlen (like in the nested constructor or in a
function call as in this test) it is needed and the NULL pointer dereferenced.
Hopefully I can soon come up with a real solution to this patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
@ 2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
2008-09-18 18:24 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: d at domob dot eu @ 2008-05-21 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-21 15:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=15664)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15664&action=view)
Testcase without nested array constructors
Actually, this does not depend on nested array constructors as this test-case
proves (and also has nothing to do with the globals used for bounds-checking,
it seems).
I believe the problem is that the gfc_expr* corresponding to the concatenation
doesn't have a cl->length set on its ts (because the arguments don't have one
when resolution is called); this NULL later causes the ICE. When this
expression turns up in an assignment, this does not matter as the expected
length is known from the target's character length definition.
But when there is no "expected" charlen (like in the nested constructor or in a
function call as in this test) it is needed and the NULL pointer dereferenced.
Hopefully I can soon come up with a real solution to this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-21 15:06 ` d at domob dot eu
@ 2008-09-18 18:24 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-20 11:54 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-18 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-04-13 20:33:00 |2008-09-18 18:22:59
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-18 18:24 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-20 11:54 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-21 15:36 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-21 15:37 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-20 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20 11:52 -------
After coming back to this bug, I believe the problem is that gfc_conv_expr
takes care of finding out string lengths' for things like TRIM(x) which don't
have a cl->length, but gfc_conv_expr_descriptor which is called e.g. for the
array constructors does not do so and calls gfc_conv_string_length with a cl
whose length is NULL.
As the problem seems to be specific to array constructors and all array
constructor elements must have the same character length, I propose to re-use
gfc_conv_expr in gfc_conv_string_length to find out the string length if it is
NULL by taking the first element of each array constructor and then calling
gfc_conv_expr to get the result's string_length.
I'll submit a patch shortly if no further problems occur.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-20 11:54 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-21 15:36 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-21 15:37 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-21 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 15:35 -------
Subject: Bug 35846
Author: domob
Date: Sun Sep 21 15:33:37 2008
New Revision: 140529
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140529
Log:
2008-09-21 Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>
PR fortran/35846
* trans.h (gfc_conv_string_length): New argument `expr'.
* trans-expr.c (flatten_array_ctors_without_strlen): New method.
(gfc_conv_string_length): New argument `expr' that is used in a new
special case handling if cl->length is NULL.
(gfc_conv_subref_array_arg): Pass expr to gfc_conv_string_length.
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_expr_descriptor): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation): Pass NULL as new expr.
(gfc_trans_g77_array), (gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_deferred_array): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_array_constructor): Save and restore old values of globals
used for bounds checking.
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_dummy_character): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_auto_character_variable): Ditto.
2008-09-21 Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>
PR fortran/35846
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_3.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_4.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_5.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_6.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_3.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_4.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_5.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_array_constructor_6.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35846] ICE on nested character constructors
2008-04-06 16:20 [Bug fortran/35846] New: ICE on nested character constructors burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-09-21 15:36 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-21 15:37 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-21 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 15:36 -------
Fixed on trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread