public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/37668]  New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
@ 2008-09-28  9:55 martinwguy at yahoo dot it
  2008-09-28  9:56 ` [Bug target/37668] " martinwguy at yahoo dot it
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: martinwguy at yahoo dot it @ 2008-09-28  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Hi
  I spotted this while trawling through the arm code generator: the code in the
NEG case has no effect. I assume the NEG case should return if the condition
matches; patch attached. It's still present in trunk.

    case NEG:
      if (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_FLOAT)
        *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (1);
      /* Fall through */
    case NOT:
      *total = COSTS_N_INSNS (ARM_NUM_REGS (mode));
      return false;


-- 
           Summary: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
GCC target triplet: arm-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
  2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
@ 2008-09-28  9:56 ` martinwguy at yahoo dot it
  2008-09-28 11:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: martinwguy at yahoo dot it @ 2008-09-28  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from martinwguy at yahoo dot it  2008-09-28 09:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=16418)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16418&action=view)
Aplies the "obvious" fix


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
  2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
  2008-09-28  9:56 ` [Bug target/37668] " martinwguy at yahoo dot it
@ 2008-09-28 11:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-10 14:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-28 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-28 11:57 -------
Don't know if the patch is OK, but the code is obviously doing something silly.
 CC-ing ARM maintainer.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-09-28 11:57:07
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
  2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
  2008-09-28  9:56 ` [Bug target/37668] " martinwguy at yahoo dot it
  2008-09-28 11:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-10 14:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-10 15:00 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-10 15:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-10 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2008-09-28 11:57:07         |2008-12-10 14:29:42
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
  2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-10 14:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-10 15:00 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-10 15:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-10 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-10 14:58 -------
Subject: Bug 37668

Author: rearnsha
Date: Wed Dec 10 14:57:18 2008
New Revision: 142647

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142647
Log:
Martin Guy <martinwguy@yahoo.it>
PR target/37668
* arm.c (arm_size_rtx_costs, case NEG): Don't fall through if the
result will be in an FPU register.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37668] Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG:
  2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-10 15:00 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-10 15:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-10 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-10 15:00 -------
Fixed in 4.4.0


-- 

rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37668


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-10 15:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-28  9:55 [Bug target/37668] New: Obvious bug in arm.c: arm_size_rtx_costs() case NEG: martinwguy at yahoo dot it
2008-09-28  9:56 ` [Bug target/37668] " martinwguy at yahoo dot it
2008-09-28 11:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 14:32 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 15:00 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-10 15:03 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).