From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9404 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2008 19:41:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7381 invoked by uid 48); 2 Oct 2008 19:40:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081002194024.7380.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/37686] [4.4 Regression] Building of CPU2000's bzip2 with peak flags with -mcpu=power4 fails with an ICE. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 19:40 ------- That bootstrapped/regtested, unfortunately the <= in the assert is not right. And when I've changed the <= in the assert to <, pr29581.f90 ICEs, it has AM_NB_INDUCTION_VARS in one particular case set to 2, and AM_LOOP_NEST_NUM's loop_depth is 1, yet the inline is called with loop_depth 3. So I guess I'll leave this to Sebastian or Jan Sjodin who added all this stuff this May. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37686