From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17332 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2008 20:27:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 17128 invoked by uid 48); 5 Oct 2008 20:26:11 -0000 Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081005202611.17127.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 20:26 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Jacques, > > Now that 4.3 is out of the door, I have no excuse. It's in the queue behind > completing my move to Barcelona, memory leaks in allocatable components + some > associated bugs and adding procedure pointers. Thus, don't hold your breath > but it's on the way. > We have had some discussion on the list about reforming array descriptors, which is what is needed here. However, this is a big job because the early gfortran developers made some unfortunate choices and left no 'reserved' fields. Quite aside from the coding job, it will wreck the gfortran API. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640