From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-264065-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17044 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2008 15:30:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 16606 invoked by uid 48); 12 Oct 2008 15:29:17 -0000
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:30:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20081012152917.16605.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-37810-7035@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/37810] Bad store sinking job
In-Reply-To: <bug-37810-7035@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00792.txt.bz2



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 15:29 -------
It looks like the testcase in comment #2 should be fixed by SSUPRE?  We have

  *p = ...;
  if ()
    foo();

where foo() is an "implicit" store to *p.  Still store sinking should be
applied
to the subloop.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37810