From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31326 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2008 08:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 31000 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2008 08:44:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081013084401.30999.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/37811] bind1st fails on mem_fun with reference argument In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00829.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-10-13 08:44 ------- Apparently the other library doesn't implement the resolution of DR 109 (if I comment out the additional operator() the code compiles). In any case, there are very long standing issues with those facilities, which will be deprecated in C++0x (we already moved the code to include/backward/) and replaced by bind. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811