From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17174 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2008 16:07:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 31817 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2008 16:06:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081013160617.31816.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/37811] bind1st fails on mem_fun with reference argument In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "igodard at pacbell dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00851.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2008-10-13 16:06 ------- Ah - I was looking at language DR109, not library DR109. However, the correct DR says the committee approved the example reported here (and adds the fix) so gcc appears to be in error to fail it. However, there is the curious remark: "Howard believes there is a flaw in this resolution. See c++std-lib-9127. We may need to reopen this issue." Unfortunately Google turns up nothing for "c++std-lib-9127" except this cryptic message, and just "9127" and other variations aren't productive either. Can you tell me where to find it? -- igodard at pacbell dot net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |igodard at pacbell dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811