public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/37831] New: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal
@ 2008-10-15 1:38 bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:39 ` [Bug c++/37831] " bangerth at dealii dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2008-10-15 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
-Wshadow is silly about this piece of code:
---------------------------------
class Foo {
int bar_;
public:
void bar(int bar)
{
bar_ = bar;
}
};
---------------------------------
This is a fairly common style. Note that local and member variable have
names that differ by the underscore. Yet:
g/x> c++ -Wshadow -c x.cc
x.cc: In member function 'void Foo::bar(int)':
x.cc:5: warning: declaration of 'bar' shadows a member of 'this'
I think that's being overly pedantic.
W.
--
Summary: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bangerth at dealii dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37831
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal
2008-10-15 1:38 [Bug c++/37831] New: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2008-10-15 1:39 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:42 ` [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variables inside classes member functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-15 1:52 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2008-10-15 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-10-15 01:38 -------
Note also that the documentation plainly states:
@item -Wshadow
@opindex Wshadow
@opindex Wno-shadow
Warn whenever a local variable shadows another local variable, parameter or
global variable or whenever a built-in function is shadowed.
The current behavior could therefore simply be classified as a bug.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37831
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variables inside classes member functions
2008-10-15 1:38 [Bug c++/37831] New: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:39 ` [Bug c++/37831] " bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2008-10-15 1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-15 1:52 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-15 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 01:40 -------
bar the function shadows bar the variable. I think the warning is correct.
The variable _bar is not being taken into account at all.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|-Wshadow warns about |-Wshadow warns about
|variable names that aren't |variables inside classes
|equal |member functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37831
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variables inside classes member functions
2008-10-15 1:38 [Bug c++/37831] New: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:39 ` [Bug c++/37831] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:42 ` [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variables inside classes member functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-15 1:52 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2008-10-15 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-10-15 01:51 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> bar the function shadows bar the variable. I think the warning is correct.
> The variable _bar is not being taken into account at all.
Ah, bummer, I didn't even look close enough to see that the function and
its argument are named the same. Silly me, I just saw this piece of code
another project was unhappy about and thought I should submit this as a bug.
You're right, and I agree that the warning is valid.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37831
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-15 1:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-15 1:38 [Bug c++/37831] New: -Wshadow warns about variable names that aren't equal bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:39 ` [Bug c++/37831] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-10-15 1:42 ` [Bug c++/37831] -Wshadow warns about variables inside classes member functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-15 1:52 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).