From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6553 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2008 23:18:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6340 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2008 23:17:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081016231701.6339.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sje at cup dot hp dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg01128.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-10-16 23:17 ------- This test uses -fno-unit-at-a-time which basically no longer exists. I believe it is currently accepted as an alias for -fno-toplevel-reorder. Does it make sense to just remove this test? -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37339