From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28308 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2008 12:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 27570 invoked by uid 48); 21 Oct 2008 12:15:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081021121501.27568.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg01326.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 12:15 ------- Is there a reason why we have to set CALL_CANNOT_INLINE_P/gimple_call_cannot_inline already during gimplification? If we defer setting it till say to lower_stmt, then by that time all the fndecls will be surely genericized and it will be still before anything will look at gimple_call_cannot_inline (ipa-inline.c, {,re}build_cgraph_edges, cfgexpand). -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36631