From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13593 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2008 15:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 13312 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2008 15:48:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081022154843.13311.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/37316] [4.4 Regression] Small structs are not passed correctly on hppa64-*-* In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "drow at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg01455.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 15:48 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Small structs are not passed correctly on hppa64-*-* On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:37:09PM -0000, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Was the "I am reasonably sure it will only affect only E500" comment in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00255.html > meant for this patch or the other one? > Clearly it makes a big difference. It was meant for this patch; for the other, I was absolutely sure. Your explanation makes sense to me. I have the same questions you do, too; I got completely lost in the different modes/types being dealt with here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37316