public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/37902] [4.3 Regression] in_system_header bug Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:41:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20081023124026.30960.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-37902-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 12:40 ------- The regression has been introduced by PR32256, before that in_system_header flag wasn't saved/restored in push_cfun/pop_cfun. The issue seems to be that allocate_struct_function call in store_parm_decls doesn't seem to have a corresponding set_cfun (NULL); call, so when push_cfun during gimplification is called, it doesn't save in_system_header (as cfun is already non-NULL) and more importantly, pop_cfun at the end of gimplification pops to the same cfun, which means in_system_header remains 1 when leaving the gimplifier and is then used by subsequent parsing of bar function. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37902
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 12:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-10-23 11:58 [Bug middle-end/37902] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-23 12:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2008-10-27 2:01 ` [Bug middle-end/37902] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-37902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-06-27 12:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20081023124026.30960.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).