From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13689 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2008 14:14:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 13074 invoked by uid 48); 27 Oct 2008 14:13:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081027141310.13073.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/37923] [4.4 Regression] CPPFLAGS now unset for stage 1 build of libcpp files. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "drow at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg01747.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 14:13 ------- It won't be logged. Paolo, any comment on the CPPFLAGS problem from comment 17? I want the top level CPPFLAGS passed down, because that's how users can add additional -I arguments. But it seems typical to do CPPFLAGS = foo @CPPFLAGS@ in subdirectories, or put foo in @CPPFLAGS@ in the subdirectory configure script, which loses foo now. -- drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bonzini at gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37923