From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8574 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2008 17:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29225 invoked by uid 48); 13 Nov 2008 17:34:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081113173412.29224.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/38052] [4.4 Regression] genautomata segfaults when -O2 is enabled In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00984.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-13 17:34 ------- > Then I used these flags with -O0 and -foptimize-sibling-calls together, but > this didn't trigger the bug. > > Is there anything I have overlooked here? Yes, not all optimizations are controlled by a specific flag, as explained in the manual. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38052