From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23115 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 15:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13503 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2008 15:10:15 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081114151015.13502.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc > gcc-4.2.x In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg01081.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 15:10 ------- Given that .text (with --relax) is ATM 48MB on cc1-dummy (and f951) and 52.7MB on cc1plus-dummy (when using somewhat older 4.4 snapshot as bootstrap compiler), I'm afraid just conditionalizing something during first stage wouldn't help us much. bl can jump just 32MB forward or backward. I think --relax on ppc32 isn't that new, at least 5 years old, if not more. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37739