From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26681 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2008 00:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14524 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2008 00:17:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081119001723.14523.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/27574] [4.2/4.3 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg01541.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #28 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 00:17 ------- Subject: Bug 27574 Author: dodji Date: Wed Nov 19 00:15:52 2008 New Revision: 141984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141984 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2008-11-14 Dodji Seketeli PR c++/27574 * gcc/cgraph.c (cgraph_remove_node): Do not remove the body of abstract functions. It might be useful to emit debugging information. This is a patch from Ian Lance Taylor. * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_optimize): Do not cry when bodies of abstract functions are still around. They are useful to output debug info. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2008-11-14 Dodji Seketeli PR c++/27574 * testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf2.exp: Backport this here from gcc-4_3-branch. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/local-var-in-contructor.C: New testcase. Added: branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/ branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf2.exp branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/local-var-in-contructor.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cgraph.c branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cgraphunit.c branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574