From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9026 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 15:53:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 29314 invoked by uid 48); 20 Nov 2008 15:52:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081120155217.29313.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/25830] [libgfortran] Optionally support multi-process locking In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg01681.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 15:52 ------- Other compilers have the SHARE= specifier for OPEN and INQUIRE, e.g. Intel or HP. I'm not sure it is needed, but one could consider supporting it as well when implementing this option. http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/docs/flin/main_for/lref_for/source_files/rflioop.htm I think Fortran 2008 does not allow to such access which makes it a non-issue in terms of the standard, including for coarrays, but still this is a not so rarely requested feature. (But one has to be careful as a user otherwise the program might read/write garbage.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830