public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
@ 2008-11-20 14:46 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 16:49 ` [Bug target/38201] " dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-20 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Both Intel FMA and AMD SSE5 support FMA. For -mfma, which enables
Intel FMA and is a dummy at the moment, or -msse5, we will
generate FMA instructions for
double f;
void
foo (double x, double y, double z)
{
f = x * y + z;
}
What FMA should "-mfma -msse5" generate? Also currently, with
"-O2 -mavx -msse5", we generate
foo:
fmaddsd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovsd %xmm0, f(%rip)
ret
which won't run on any machines. For "-mfma -msse5" and
"-mavx -msse5",
1. Should these combinations be allowed? If allowed,
2. Should the last option turn off the first one?
--
Summary: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-20 16:49 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 16:59 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com @ 2008-11-20 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2008-11-20 16:48 -------
1) -msse5 includes -mfma switch (because fma is a part of sse5 instructions).
So having "-msse5 -mfma" is same as having just "msse5", though you can just
have -fma (without -msse5).
2) "-mavx -msse5" => Yes. This would not make sense since no machine can run
this.
- Dwarak
(In reply to comment #0)
> Both Intel FMA and AMD SSE5 support FMA. For -mfma, which enables
> Intel FMA and is a dummy at the moment, or -msse5, we will
> generate FMA instructions for
>
> double f;
>
> void
> foo (double x, double y, double z)
> {
> f = x * y + z;
> }
>
> What FMA should "-mfma -msse5" generate? Also currently, with
> "-O2 -mavx -msse5", we generate
>
> foo:
> fmaddsd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
> vmovsd %xmm0, f(%rip)
> ret
>
> which won't run on any machines. For "-mfma -msse5" and
> "-mavx -msse5",
>
> 1. Should these combinations be allowed? If allowed,
> 2. Should the last option turn off the first one?
>
(In reply to comment #0)
> Both Intel FMA and AMD SSE5 support FMA. For -mfma, which enables
> Intel FMA and is a dummy at the moment, or -msse5, we will
> generate FMA instructions for
>
> double f;
>
> void
> foo (double x, double y, double z)
> {
> f = x * y + z;
> }
>
> What FMA should "-mfma -msse5" generate? Also currently, with
> "-O2 -mavx -msse5", we generate
>
> foo:
> fmaddsd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
> vmovsd %xmm0, f(%rip)
> ret
>
> which won't run on any machines. For "-mfma -msse5" and
> "-mavx -msse5",
>
> 1. Should these combinations be allowed? If allowed,
> 2. Should the last option turn off the first one?
>
--
dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dwarak dot rajagopal at amd
| |dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 16:49 ` [Bug target/38201] " dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
@ 2008-11-20 16:59 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 18:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-20 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 16:57 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> 1) -msse5 includes -mfma switch (because fma is a part of sse5 instructions).
> So having "-msse5 -mfma" is same as having just "msse5", though you can just
> have -fma (without -msse5).
Please look closely. I added -mfma to i386.opt:
---
mfma
Target Report Mask(ISA_FMA) Var(ix86_isa_flags) VarExists
Support MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX and FMA built-in
functions and code generation
---
It has nothing to with SSE5. SSE5 never implies TARGET_FMA.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 16:49 ` [Bug target/38201] " dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 16:59 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-20 18:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 19:36 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-20 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 18:52 -------
Since -mfma implies -mavx, we got
[hjl@gnu-26 gcc]$ cat f.c
double f;
void
foo (double x, double y, double z)
{
f = x * y + z;
}
[hjl@gnu-26 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 -mfma -msse5 f.c -S
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
[hjl@gnu-26 gcc]$ cat f.s
.file "f.c"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl foo
.type foo, @function
foo:
fmaddsd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vmovsd %xmm0, f(%rip)
ret
.size foo, .-foo
.comm f,8,8
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.4.0 20081120 (experimental) [trunk revision
142045]"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-26 gcc]$
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 18:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-20 19:36 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 19:48 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com @ 2008-11-20 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2008-11-20 19:35 -------
Yes, you are right. "-mfma -msse5" does not make sense. I mistook -mfma for
-mfused-madd and hence the confusion.
Hence these combinations (1 and 2) does not make sense.
Thanks,
Dwarak
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 19:36 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
@ 2008-11-20 19:48 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 19:51 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-20 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 19:46 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes, you are right. "-mfma -msse5" does not make sense. I mistook -mfma for
> -mfused-madd and hence the confusion.
>
> Hence these combinations (1 and 2) does not make sense.
>
Should we disallow such combinations?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 19:48 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-20 19:51 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 21:30 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com @ 2008-11-20 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2008-11-20 19:49 -------
> Should we disallow such combinations?
>
Yes.
- Dwarak
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 19:51 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
@ 2008-11-20 21:30 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-21 12:02 ` Joey dot ye at intel dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-20 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 21:29 -------
We have the same issue with -m3dnow, -m3dnowa and -msse4a.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-20 21:30 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-21 12:02 ` Joey dot ye at intel dot com
2008-11-21 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Joey dot ye at intel dot com @ 2008-11-21 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2008-11-21 12:00 -------
In short, set A={-favx, -ffma}, set B={-f3dnow, -f3dnowa, -fsse4a, -fsse5}. Any
option combination from both sets should be prohibited.
Please add more options into these set in case I missed any.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-21 12:02 ` Joey dot ye at intel dot com
@ 2008-11-21 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-21 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-21 13:35 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> In short, set A={-favx, -ffma}, set B={-f3dnow, -f3dnowa, -fsse4a, -fsse5}. Any
It is -mXXX, not -fXXX.
> option combination from both sets should be prohibited.
>
That is correct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-21 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-22 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-22 15:10 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-22 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-22 15:03 -------
We should have -mfma to enable a fused multiply-add instruction that is
available
when enabling either -msse5 or -mavx. -mfma should not itself enable any
of the instruction set enabling features.
HJ, why did you need -mfma and could not have used -mfused-madd for this?
IMHO -mfma is confusing and should be removed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-22 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-22 15:10 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-22 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-22 15:09 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> We should have -mfma to enable a fused multiply-add instruction that is
> available
> when enabling either -msse5 or -mavx. -mfma should not itself enable any
> of the instruction set enabling features.
>
> HJ, why did you need -mfma and could not have used -mfused-madd for this?
> IMHO -mfma is confusing and should be removed.
>
Intel FMA is a separate instruction set with its own feature bit in CPUID.
Using -mfused-madd -mavx to enable an instruction set doesn't look
appropriate to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-22 15:10 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-22 15:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-11-22 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-22 15:15 -------
Richard asked:
Why should it (-mavx -msse5) be disallowed if a user asks for it? Do we
disallow -msse4a -mssse4?
Reply:
-msse4a -mssse4 can generate code which runs if you check the feature
bit in CPUID before calling an appropriate function. But -mavx -msse5
will generate codes which won't run on any machines.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-22 15:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-11-22 15:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-23 18:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-22 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-22 15:31 -------
I see.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-22 15:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-23 18:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 16:51 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-12-09 22:00 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-23 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 18:28 -------
>But -mavx -msse5 will generate codes which won't run on any machines.
It could run on a simulator that has both (or a new processor which has not
come out yet). Or are there conflicts with the opcodes themselves? So I don't
see why this is a really a bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-23 18:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-03 16:51 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-12-09 22:00 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-03 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-03 16:50 -------
Simulator is fine. AVX executable can only run on simulator. If
there is a simulator which can run SSE5 and AVX, we will add
a new switch for it.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-12-03 16:50:15
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-03 16:51 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-09 22:00 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
15 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-09 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-09 21:58 -------
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00585.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2008-
| |12/msg00585.html
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|2008-12-03 16:50:15 |2008-12-09 21:58:04
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38201] -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together
[not found] <bug-38201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-01-16 16:24 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-16 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38201
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-01-16 15:56:59 UTC ---
-msse5 is gone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-16 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-20 14:46 [Bug target/38201] New: -mfma/-mavx and -msse5/-msse4a don't work together hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 16:49 ` [Bug target/38201] " dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 16:59 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 18:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 19:36 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 19:48 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-20 19:51 ` dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
2008-11-20 21:30 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-21 12:02 ` Joey dot ye at intel dot com
2008-11-21 13:36 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-22 15:10 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-11-22 15:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-23 18:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 16:51 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-12-09 22:00 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[not found] <bug-38201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-16 16:24 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).