[Bug fortran/38305] New: Bug in gfortran with combination of P and F in a format.

[Bug fortran/38305] New: Bug in gfortran with combination of P and F in a format.

[fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com]

Compile and run

      print '(f14.0,4pf14.0 )', 3742.0, 0.3742
      end

Actual Results:  
         3742.         0000.

Expected Results:  
         3742.         3742.

On Gentoo this fails with versions 4.3.  On Ubuntu with version 4.2.  It works
for me with GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.1.

>From a long time member of X3J3

I agree that the discussion of P editing in 10.6.5.1 is silent
concerning F editing on output, which might lead one to conclude that it
has no effect.  But the last paragraph about F editing in 10.5.1.2.1
(167:23) says "modified by the established scale factor."  So I think
the new compiler is broken.

Four of my compilers (lf95, NAG, Intel, g95 (4.0.3 0.91!)) give your old
results.  gfortran (4.1.2 20071124) gives your new results, which I
think are wrong.


-- 
           Summary: Bug in gfortran with combination of P and F in a format.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com
 GCC build triplet: Several


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38305

[Bug fortran/38305] Bug in gfortran with combination of P and F in a format.

[jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-28 19:58 -------
Thanks for report.  We have it on the list already and i am working on it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38285 ***


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38305