From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-268102-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17540 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2008 20:38:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 15238 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2008 20:37:33 -0000
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20081130203733.15237.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-37779-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug fortran/37779] Missing RECURSIVE not detected
In-Reply-To: <bug-37779-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "domob at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg02676.txt.bz2



------- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-30 20:37 -------
Subject: Bug 37779

Author: domob
Date: Sun Nov 30 20:36:10 2008
New Revision: 142299

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142299
Log:
2008-11-30  Daniel Kraft  <d@domob.eu>

        PR fortran/37779
        * gfortran.h (struct gfc_entry_list): Fixed typo in comment.
        * resolve.c (is_illegal_recursion): New method.
        (resolve_procedure_expression): Use new is_illegal_recursion instead of
        direct check and handle function symbols correctly.
        (resolve_actual_arglist): Removed useless recursion check.
        (resolve_function): Use is_illegal_recursion instead of direct check.
        (resolve_call): Ditto.

2008-11-30  Daniel Kraft  <d@domob.eu>

        PR fortran/37779
        * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_1.f: Changed expected error message to
        the more general new one.
        * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_2.f90: Ditto.
        * gfortran.dg/entry_18.f90: Ditto.
        * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_4.f03: Do "the same" check also for
        FUNCTIONS, as this is different in details from SUBROUTINES.
        * gfortran.dg/recursive_check_6.f03: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_6.f03
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/entry_18.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_1.f
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_2.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_4.f03


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779