[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-06-12 10:03 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2008-12-08 19:36 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2006-06-12 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2006-06-12 07:18 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

still failing ... since it has been opened about 2.5y ago, should it be closed
as wontfix ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-06-12 10:03 ` [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2008-12-08 19:36 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2008-12-08 20:22 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2008-12-08 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2008-12-08 19:34 -------
                                 |
                               \ ' /
                             -- (*) --
                                >*<
                               >0<@<
                              >>>@<<*
                             >@>*<0<<<
                            >*>>@<<<@<<
                           >@>>0<<<*<<@<
                          >*>>0<<@<<<@<<<
                         >@>>*<<@<>*<<0<*<
           \*/          >0>>*<<@<>0><<*<@<<
       ___\\U//___     >*>>@><0<<*>>@><*<0<<
       |\\ | | \\|    >@>>0<*<0>>@<<0<<<*<@<<  
       | \\| | _(UU)_ >((*))_>0><*<0><@<<<0<*<
       |\ \| || / //||.*.*.*.|>>@<<*<<@>><0<<<
  jgs  |\\_|_|&&_// ||*.*.*.*|_\\db//_               
       """"|'.'.'.|~~|.*.*.*|     ____|_
           |'.'.'.|   ^^^^^^|____|>>>>>>|
           ~~~~~~~~         '""""`------'


5 years later ... adding a Christmas tree to the bug report.


-- 

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-10 05:30:31         |2008-12-08 19:34:48
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-06-12 10:03 ` [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  2008-12-08 19:36 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2008-12-08 20:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-08 20:31 ` [Bug web/12821] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-08 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-08 20:20 -------
Joseph Myers introduced this in the manual with the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-01/msg00726.html

So this is a regression.

Ah, and Joseph also explained how to fix this, see comment #2.  So this should
be fixed in the blink of an eye then, no?


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|dead link on                |[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
                   |onlinedocs/gccint/Top-      |dead link on
                   |Level.html                  |onlinedocs/gccint/Top-
                   |                            |Level.html


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-08 20:22 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-08 20:31 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-08 20:34 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-08 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-08 20:29 -------
As I explained in 2003, this is a web problem, not a source code bug, and so
not a regression.  It is a new feature of the manual such that each user of the
manual may need to do something to take advantage of the new feature, and that
applies to the onlinedocs on gcc.gnu.org just as it does to any user of "make
install-html".


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
            Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]    |dead link on
                   |dead link on                |onlinedocs/gccint/Top-
                   |onlinedocs/gccint/Top-      |Level.html
                   |Level.html                  |
   Target Milestone|4.2.5                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-08 20:31 ` [Bug web/12821] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-08 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-08 20:41 ` [Bug web/12821] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-08 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-08 20:34 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-08 20:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-08 21:01 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-08 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-08 20:40 -------
Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference.

And I was under the impression that there was a kind-of "you broke it, you fix
it rule" with GCC bugs.  Am I wrong or does this just not apply to you?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-08 20:41 ` [Bug web/12821] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-08 21:01 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
  2008-12-09  9:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-09 13:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2008-12-08 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2008-12-08 21:00 -------
Subject: Re:  dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference.

The reference is to a whole manual (etc/configure.texi in the src 
repository), not to one paragraph.

> And I was under the impression that there was a kind-of "you broke it, you fix
> it rule" with GCC bugs.  Am I wrong or does this just not apply to you?

There is no such rule beyond the limited reversion rule in develop.html.

As explained, this is a missing website feature, not a GCC bug.  The link 
in the manual is a correct link in the global namespace for Texinfo 
manuals.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-08 21:01 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2008-12-09  9:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-09 13:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-09  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-09 09:00 -------
Something as simple as this would already fix the broken link.

Index: gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi    (revision 142582)
+++ gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi    (working copy)
@@ -93,8 +93,14 @@
 The build system in the top level directory, including how recursion
 into subdirectories works and how building runtime libraries for
 multilibs is handled, is documented in a separate manual, included
-with GNU Binutils.  @xref{Top, , GNU configure and build system,
+with GNU Binutils.
+@c ??? This manual is apparently not available online.  Keep the cross
+@c reference for 'info' but leave it out of HTML pages to avoid broken
+@c links on the web site.
+@ifinfo
+@xref{Top, , GNU configure and build system,
 configure, The GNU configure and build system}, for details.
+@end ifinfo

 @node gcc Directory
 @section The @file{gcc} Subdirectory


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-09  9:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-09 13:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2008-12-09 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

------- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2008-12-09 13:40 -------
Subject: Re:  dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> +@c ??? This manual is apparently not available online.  Keep the cross

But it is online - http://www.airs.com/ian/configure/ - and while that's 
not a makeinfo --html copy, when it's only linking to the manual as a 
whole that doesn't matter much (a single redirect in .htaccess should 
suffice - and the fix being such a redirect is why I say this is a web 
problem not a manual problem).

I believe the description of how multilibs are built is still relevant, 
although no-one has updated that manual to reflect toplevel 
autoconfiscation.  If the assignment issues were resolved (that manual has 
a Cygnus copyright notice) then it might make sense to move the multilib 
documentation into the GCC documentation and remove the reference to this 
old manual.

-- 

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

[parent not found: <bug-12821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-01-21  8:07 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
  2013-01-21 11:04 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-21 11:15 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch @ 2013-01-21  8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821

Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2008-12-08 19:34:48         |2013-01-21 19:34:48
                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat
                   |                            |dot ethz.ch

--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-01-21 08:07:20 UTC ---
CLOSE WONTFIX ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-01-21  8:07 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
@ 2013-01-21 11:04 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-21 11:15 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 11:03:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> CLOSE WONTFIX ?

No, there are several possible fixes:

* A patch to .htaccess to redirect to Ian's webpage as suggested in comment #5.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#webchanges

* Contact Ian Lance Taylor, figure out the copyright issues to move the manual
to the GCC repository, and if they cannot be solved, create a new manual from
scratch. 

The problem is not that the bug cannot be or is not desired to be solved. The
problem is that no one is not sufficiently interested on solving it to spent
the time and effort required. If you are, please do it!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
       [not found] <bug-12821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-01-21  8:07 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
  2013-01-21 11:04 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-21 11:15 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821

--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 11:14:43 UTC ---
In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document
is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources:

http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/

and move any GCC-specific parts (e.g., multilibs) directly to the GCC internal
documentation.

Of course, this requires *new people* to do it, it is clearly not a priority
for the existing devs.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-21 11:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-12821-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-06-12 10:03 ` [Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2008-12-08 19:36 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2008-12-08 20:22 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-08 20:31 ` [Bug web/12821] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-08 20:34 ` [Bug web/12821] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-08 20:41 ` [Bug web/12821] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-08 21:01 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2008-12-09  9:02 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-09 13:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
     [not found] <bug-12821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-01-21  8:07 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 11:04 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 11:15 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).