public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/37131] inline matmul for small matrix sizes Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:13:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20081209221220.5887.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-37131-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 22:12 ------- Created an attachment (id=16866) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16866&action=view) better test case Thou shalt use IMPLICIT none, especially if you think you don't need it... Here's a better test case, which actually tests the right thing. Timings with 4.4 on i686-pc-linux-gnu: matmul = 15.596974 s subroutine with explicit interface: 3.6842318 s unrolled subroutine with explicit interface: 3.3522091 s inline with sum 3.3602085 s -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #16134|0 |1 is obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 22:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-08-15 19:24 [Bug fortran/37131] New: " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 22:56 ` [Bug fortran/37131] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 13:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 16:20 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 20:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 22:13 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2010-05-14 9:15 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 22:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 6:55 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com 2010-06-05 8:49 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 9:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 18:27 ` tkoenig at netcologne dot de [not found] <bug-37131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-01-02 23:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-03 19:56 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-11 16:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-18 23:09 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-18 23:17 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-20 11:45 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-30 22:13 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-01 7:15 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2015-05-01 8:32 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-05-01 11:25 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2015-05-01 13:16 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-02 11:31 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2015-05-03 18:10 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-06 20:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-06 21:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-12 6:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-21 19:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-23 22:11 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20081209221220.5887.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).