From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8104 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2008 12:48:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 7939 invoked by uid 48); 16 Dec 2008 12:47:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081216124727.7938.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 (callgraph optimization, inline heuristics, expand ) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg01604.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-16 12:47 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Re. comment #18, I'd say "brilliant" if it wasn't such a poor performance :-) I agree... quite an achievement not to crash in such a case. > Did you manage to get a time report out of that run? no... obviously I can rerun this (numbers tomorrow, of course)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474