public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD
@ 2007-04-05 18:44 rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 19:28 ` [Bug target/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-05 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
.../libjava/classpath/include/jvmti.h:1242: warning: can not pass objects
of non-POD type 'struct va_list' through '...'; call will abort at runtime
Not sure yet whether this is a target problem or not.
--
Summary: va_list considered non-POD
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: alpha*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-05 19:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 20:45 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-05 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-05 20:28 -------
Most likely this is because va_list is represented as an array for alpha and a
couple other targets. So maybe it might be just the warning is incorrect but
it is still undefined.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 19:28 ` [Bug target/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-04-05 20:45 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 20:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-04-05 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-05 21:45 -------
It is *not* represented as an array on Alpha.
And even if it were, it wouldn't be undefined. Passing va_list by
value is non-portable, but certainly not undefined.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 19:28 ` [Bug target/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 20:45 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-29 20:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 20:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-29 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]
------- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 20:39 -------
The testcase:
#include <stdarg.h>
extern int foo (int a, int b, ...);
int bar (int a, int b, ...)
{
va_list args;
va_start (args, b);
int result = foo (a, b, args);
va_end (args);
return result;
}
g++ -O2:
pod.C: In function int bar(int, int, ...):
pod.C:9: warning: cannot pass objects of non-POD type struct va_list through
...; call will abort at runtime
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |38664
nThis| |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-12-29 20:39:29
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 20:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-29 20:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 20:50 ` [Bug c++/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-29 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 20:42 -------
Preprocessed source, can be compiled with a crosscompiler:
--cut here--
# 1 "pod.C"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command-line>"
# 1 "pod.C"
# 1 "/usr/lib/gcc/alpha-linux-gnu/4.2.4/include/stdarg.h" 1 3 4
# 43 "/usr/lib/gcc/alpha-linux-gnu/4.2.4/include/stdarg.h" 3 4
typedef __builtin_va_list __gnuc_va_list;
# 105 "/usr/lib/gcc/alpha-linux-gnu/4.2.4/include/stdarg.h" 3 4
typedef __gnuc_va_list va_list;
# 2 "pod.C" 2
extern int foo (int a, int b, ...);
int bar (int a, int b, ...)
{
va_list args;
__builtin_va_start(args,b);
int result = foo (a, b, args);
__builtin_va_end(args);
return result;
}
--cut here--
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 20:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-29 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 20:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-29 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 20:46 -------
sounds like the C++ front-end does not know this struct is a POD. I am going
to mark this as a front-end bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|target |c++
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 20:50 ` [Bug c++/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-29 20:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-29 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 20:57 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> It is *not* represented as an array on Alpha.
But as a RECORD_TYPE. Following patch cures the warning:
Index: cp/tree.c
===================================================================
--- cp/tree.c (revision 142948)
+++ cp/tree.c (working copy)
@@ -2113,6 +2113,9 @@ pod_type_p (const_tree t)
argument unmodified and we assign it to a const_tree. */
t = strip_array_types (CONST_CAST_TREE(t));
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == RECORD_TYPE)
+ return 1;
+
if (t == error_mark_node)
return 1;
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t))
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 20:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-29 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 23:36 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-29 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 21:02 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > It is *not* represented as an array on Alpha.
>
> But as a RECORD_TYPE. Following patch cures the warning:
But that is not correct as some nonPODs are structs too. In fact structs
containing other nonPODs are still nonPODs. Structs that have non trivial
constructors are also nonPODs.
So the patch is in fact incorrect.
if (! CLASS_TYPE_P (t))
return 0; /* other non-class type (reference or function) */
if (CLASSTYPE_NON_POD_P (t))
return 0;
return 1;
One of those two should be set correctly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-29 23:36 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-30 14:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-29 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 23:29 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> if (! CLASS_TYPE_P (t))
> return 0; /* other non-class type (reference or function) */
> if (CLASSTYPE_NON_POD_P (t))
> return 0;
> return 1;
>
> One of those two should be set correctly.
In alpha/alpha.c we have:
alpha_build_builtin_va_list (void)
{
tree base, ofs, space, record, type_decl;
if (TARGET_ABI_OPEN_VMS || TARGET_ABI_UNICOSMK)
return ptr_type_node;
record = (*lang_hooks.types.make_type) (RECORD_TYPE);
type_decl = build_decl (TYPE_DECL, get_identifier ("__va_list_tag"), record);
TREE_CHAIN (record) = type_decl;
TYPE_NAME (record) = type_decl;
/* C++? SET_IS_AGGR_TYPE (record, 1); */
...
So, actually there is no way we can SET_CLASS_TYPE_P (t, 1) on the created
RECORD_TYPE. IOW, we should somehow be able to reach cp/lex.c/make_class_type
() function from target .c file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-29 23:36 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-30 14:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-31 17:06 ` [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-30 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-30 14:45 -------
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01280.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2008-
| |12/msg01280.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-30 14:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-31 17:06 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-31 17:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-12-31 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-31 17:02 -------
Marking as a regression, testsuite failures are always regressions.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|va_list considered non-POD |[4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list
| |considered non-POD
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-31 17:06 ` [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-12-31 17:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 20:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-31 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-31 17:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 20:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-07 20:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-12-29 20:39:29 |2009-01-05 20:01:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 20:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-07 20:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-08 7:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-07 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 20:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=17051)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17051&action=view)
Fix in pod_type_p
Uros is testing this patch for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-07 20:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-08 7:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-01-12 21:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-08 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 07:04 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Created an attachment (id=17051)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17051&action=view) [edit]
> Fix in pod_type_p
>
> Uros is testing this patch for me.
This patch bootstraps OK and fixes following libjava FAILs on
alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu:
-FAIL: natgetargssize.cc compilation
-FAIL: natgetlocalvartable.cc compilation
-FAIL: natgetstacktrace.cc compilation
-FAIL: natevents.cc compilation
-FAIL: natgetallthreads.cc compilation
-FAIL: natgeterrorname.cc compilation
-FAIL: natgetmethodname.cc compilation
The patch was also bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
{,-m32} without any problems.
BTW: Cleaned testcase can be found at [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01280.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |
|patches/2008- |
|12/msg01280.html |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-08 7:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-12 21:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 22:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 22:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-12 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 21:07 -------
Subject: Bug 31488
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 12 21:07:46 2009
New Revision: 143308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143308
Log:
PR c++/31488
* tree.c (pod_type_p): Return 1 for structs created by the back end.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/vararg-3.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/tree.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-12 21:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-15 22:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 22:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-15 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 22:34 -------
Subject: Bug 31488
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 15 22:34:20 2009
New Revision: 143413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143413
Log:
PR c++/36334
PR c++/37646
* tree.c (lvalue_p_1): Handle BASELINK. A COMPONENT_REF to
a function isn't necessarily an lvalue. Take tree, not const_tree.
(lvalue_p, real_lvalue_p): Take tree, not const_tree.
* typeck.c (lvalue_or_else): Likewise.
* cp-tree.h: Adjust prototypes.
PR c++/31488
* tree.c (pod_type_p): Return 1 for structs created by the back end.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/memfn1.C
- copied unchanged from r143404,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/memfn1.C
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/memfn2.C
- copied unchanged from r143404,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/memfn2.C
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/vararg-3.C
- copied unchanged from r143308,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/vararg-3.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/tree.c
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/typeck.c
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 22:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-15 22:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-15 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 22:54 -------
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-15 22:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-05 18:44 [Bug target/31488] New: va_list considered non-POD rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 19:28 ` [Bug target/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-05 20:45 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 20:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 20:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 20:50 ` [Bug c++/31488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 20:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-29 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-29 23:36 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-30 14:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-31 17:06 ` [Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-12-31 17:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 20:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-07 20:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-08 7:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2009-01-12 21:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 22:35 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 22:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).