From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29654 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2008 13:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27788 invoked by uid 48); 30 Dec 2008 13:37:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20081230133730.27787.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/38584] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Inline heuristics run even at -O0 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg02936.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 13:37 ------- We should not use the full bin-packing algorithm for any optimization level. A simpler heuristic is called for. I'll see if I can come up with something. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38584