From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31542 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2009 21:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29133 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2009 21:26:28 -0000 Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090103212628.29132.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/33097] Function decl trees without proper argument list In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 21:26 ------- For the interested reader, see another approach here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-12/msg00306.html Instead of "guessing" the arguments, I fused existing decls with later interfaces. It generally workes, but the patch is a horrible hack (see thread for comments and a different approach). -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33097