* [Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-05 13:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-05 13:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-01-05 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 13:54 -------
The executable aborts on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (r143074) when compiled with
-m32, but passes when compiled with -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-05 13:54 ` [Bug fortran/38726] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-01-05 13:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-05 13:58 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-01-05 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 13:57 -------
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00421.html for
powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-05 13:54 ` [Bug fortran/38726] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-05 13:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-01-05 13:58 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 13:58 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> On Linux/ia64, revision 143058 gave
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 -O0 execution test
>
According to the gcc-testresults mailing list, this is confirmed on
powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0, ia64-unknown-linux-gnu, powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0.
It's not really a regression though, as I introduced the failing testcase as
part of revision 143057.
Please can someone test on older revisions/provide more information?
Without access to such machines, it will be hard to find the culprit.
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-01-05 13:58:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 13:58 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-05 14:24 ` [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-01-05 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 14:14 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please can someone test on older revisions/provide more information?
The test passes with gfortran 4.2.3, but not 4.3.2 on powerpc-apple-darwin9.
Hence it is a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-01-05 14:24 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 14:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 14:24 -------
Marking as regression according to Dominique's comment.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |4.3.2 4.4.0
Known to work| |4.2.3
Summary|gfortran.dg/elemental_subrou|[4.3/4.4 Regression]
|tine_7.f90 fail on |gfortran.dg/elemental_subrou
|Linux/ia64 |tine_7.f90 fail on
| |Linux/ia64
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 14:24 ` [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 14:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-05 15:08 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-01-05 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 14:47 -------
If compiled with -fbounds-check, the executable yields:
At line 29 of file
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90
Fortran runtime error: Array reference out of bounds for array 'p', lower bound
of dimension 1 exceeded(-2 < 1)
The problem comes from
...
p = 20 * r - 10
...
call tq_tvgh (q(k_lev:), (p(p(k_lev:))))
if (any (p(p) /= q)) call abort
where min(p)=-10, outside the bounds of p(1:42).
If I use ' p = 41 * r + 1', the test passes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 14:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-01-05 15:08 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 18:44 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-06 13:45 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 15:08 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> If compiled with -fbounds-check, the executable yields:
>
> At line 29 of file
> /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90
> Fortran runtime error: Array reference out of bounds for array 'p', lower bound
> of dimension 1 exceeded(-2 < 1)
>
> The problem comes from
>
> ...
> p = 20 * r - 10
> ...
> call tq_tvgh (q(k_lev:), (p(p(k_lev:))))
> if (any (p(p) /= q)) call abort
>
> where min(p)=-10, outside the bounds of p(1:42).
>
> If I use ' p = 41 * r + 1', the test passes.
>
Yes, of course. Stupid me.
I started with the random thing, and I added the vector subscript later.
Thanks Dominique.
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 15:08 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 18:44 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-06 13:45 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 18:44 -------
Subject: Bug 38726
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Jan 5 18:44:09 2009
New Revision: 143084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143084
Log:
2009-01-05 Mikael Morin <mikael.morin@tele2.fr>
PR fortran/38669
PR fortran/38726
* gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90:
Fix p values so that it can be used as vector subscript.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/38726] [4.3/4.4 Regression] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64
2009-01-05 2:23 [Bug fortran/38726] New: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 18:44 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-06 13:45 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-06 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 13:45 -------
Looks like it's fixed now.
Thanks for the report.
Closing.
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread