public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
@ 2008-12-21 12:50 doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
seen with 20081213, on hppa-linux-gnu, building with -g -O2 -fPIC
/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:
In static member f
unction 'static void BytecodeInterpreter::run(BytecodeInterpreter*)':
/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
error: goto de
stination is neither a label nor a pointer
goto D.98183;
/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
error: goto de
stination is neither a label nor a pointer
goto D.98183;
[this message repeats]
/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
--
Summary: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: hppa-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=16952)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16952&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=16953)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16953&action=view)
build log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:58 -------
precompiled header file at:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/tmp/_precompiled.incl.gch.bz2
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail| |4.4.0
Known to work| |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 17:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-21 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|target |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-21 17:27 -------
Does disabling PCH fix the issue (just adding -D__disable_PCH__ should be
enough to disable PCH when building that one file)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-22 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-22 10:58 -------
no, same result.
btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-02 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 11:34 -------
That's unexpected. Anyway, if you move away the gch file (or directory), can
you still reproduce it and if yes, attach preprocessed source?
Otherwise it would be extremely hard to reproduce for anyone...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-04 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 22:08 -------
Maybe the bug boils down to PR38725.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2009-01-05 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-05 18:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=17034)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 21:48 -------
That's really a duplicate of PR38725: The code contains many lines of the form
goto *dispatch_table[opcode];
where dispatch_table[opcode] is of the type uintptr_t which is a typedef
to unsigned int. Writing
goto *(void*)dispatch_table[opcode];
instead makes the ICE disappear.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38725 ***
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-05 21:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).