public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/38669] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Array bounds violation for arguments of elemental subroutine Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090108230144.9028.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-38669-6318@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 23:01 ------- Huh, the regression state of this bug looks weird. So we have a patch applied on trunk, but known-to-fail is both 4.3.3 and 4.4.0 - but 4.3.2 works? And the target milestone is 4.4.0? If it is really a regression on the branch (4.3.3 vs. 4.3.2) it definitely should be 4.3.3. Changed as such, to get on the radar for 4.3.3 again. Please adjust known-to-work and known-to-fail accordingly. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38669
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 23:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-12-30 10:33 [Bug fortran/38669] New: [Regression] " anlauf at gmx dot de 2008-12-30 11:19 ` [Bug fortran/38669] [4.3, 4.4 Regression] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 11:57 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 14:05 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 15:04 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 16:47 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 19:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-31 10:48 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 0:41 ` [Bug fortran/38669] [4.3/4.4 " mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 19:12 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 13:37 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 18:44 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 21:57 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 23:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2009-01-14 20:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 21:12 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-38669-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-11-11 0:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090108230144.9028.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).